Independent Data Observatory · June 2026

Flows
Multilateral
Transparency

An evidence-based study of $777B of UN system revenue across 14 years. Every figure sourced from primary public data. No institutional affiliation. No inference of intent.

Short on time? The 90-second brief →

$777B
revenue · 2011–2024
7.8%
core share of
total revenue 2024
30.6%
US share of government
contributions 2024
7
entities >50% funded
by one government
The Story
Three chapters on funding quality, concentration and the signals in the data, for non-specialist readers.
Read the analysis
The Observatory
Nine analytical layers. 29 charts. UNGM procurement tables as published. Complete dataset with full methodology.
Explore the data
Scroll
Key Findings

Eight findings, each traceable to a published source.

Each figure comes from flows.json and can be reproduced from the cited dataset. The ⓘ next to each number gives source, years, formula and limitation.

7.8%
Core share of revenue
Core (un-earmarked) contributions were 7.8% of total revenue in 2024 and 11.4% of voluntary contributions. The lowest value in the series was 7.7% in 2020.
CEB Financial Statistics 2011–2024
Funding Compact
60.6%
Earmarked share of revenue
Earmarked contributions rose from 49.6% of revenue in 2011 to 60.6% in 2024, while the assessed share fell from 33.5% to 20.2%.
CEB Financial Statistics 2011–2024
Earmarking
30.6%
Largest government contributor
The United States provided 30.6% of all government contributions in 2024 ($14.3B). The second-largest government contributor provided 10.2%.
CEB Revenue by Government Donor 2024
Donor concentration
7
Entities with one majority donor
In 7 entities one government provides more than half of government contributions: UNHCR 57.9%, IOM 55.2%, WFP 52.3% and UNAIDS 52.2% (United States), UNITAID (France), UNICRI (Italy) and UNSSC (Germany).
CEB Revenue by Government Donor 2024
Donor concentration
-37%
Year-on-year volatility
WFP revenue changed by -37% ($5.3B) between 2022 and 2023. 2022 was an exceptional peak in the series.
CEB Financial Statistics 2021–2024
Funding predictability
$290.6B
Expenditure without a comparable functional breakdown (CEB series before 2018)
The CEB expenditure-by-function series starts in 2018: 43.7% of country-level expenditure 2013 to 2024 ($290.6B, all of it in 2013 to 2019) has no comparable breakdown into humanitarian, development, peace or normative functions. A series break in the published data, not a reporting failure.
CEB Expenditure by country and function
Series break · comparability
69×
Range across SDGs, resources tagged by SDG
For the highest goal (SDG 2), resources tagged by SDG (expenditure, or budget where only budget is reported) are 69× those of the lowest (SDG 14); on expenditure rows only, 62×. Three goals account for 60%; eight goals share 9%.
CEB Expenditure by SDG 2018–2024
Funding Compact
130,948
Workforce
UN system entities reported 130,948 staff in 2024, +23% since 2017; 47.7% are women. Switzerland and the United States host the most staff, reflecting headquarters in Geneva and New York.
CEB HR Statistics 2017–2024
UN80
What this means for decision-makers

Three questions the data allows you to ask

These are questions, not answers. Each one connects a figure in this study to a debate already open in the UN system.

Funding quality
Core contributions are 11.4% of voluntary contributions. How far is each entity from its Funding Compact commitments on core and pooled funding, and which entity-level series would show progress year by year?
Funding Compact · earmarking
Donor concentration
In 7 entities a single government provides more than half of all government contributions. Which diversification or contingency measures do their governing bodies review, and how often?
Donor concentration
Comparable baseline
The CEB expenditure-by-function series starts in 2018: $290.6B of 2013 to 2019 country expenditure has no comparable functional breakdown. Which baseline year should proposals that compare functions over time use, given this series break?
Series break · comparability

Want one entity at a time? Open the Agency Lens: each entity's funding mix, government contributors, reporting and a CEB-based approximation of the Funding Compact indicators where they apply.

Primary Sources

All data. All public. All reproducible.

Every figure in this observatory is derived exclusively from primary public sources. No data has been estimated, imputed, or generated. Gaps are reported as gaps.

Source Coverage Used for Status URL
UN CEB Financial Statistics 2011–2024 · 48 entities Revenue, expenditure, funding types, agency profiles Recomputed 2026-11-01 unsceb.org/data-download
CEB Revenue by Government Donor 2013–2024 · 230 government contributors as listed by the CEB Concentration (direct bilateral government HHI), US share of each entity's government contributions Recomputed 2026-11-01 unsceb.org/fs-revenue-government-donor
UNGM Annual Statistical Report 2019–2024 · $24.9B (2023), $25.7B (2024) Procurement by org, sector (UNSPSC), supplier country Recomputed 2026-11-01 ungm.org/public/asr
CEB HR Statistics 2017–2024 · 20+ entities Staff count, gender, nationality, duty stations Recomputed 2026-11-01 unsceb.org/hr-statistics
World Bank Open Data 2023 · 190+ countries Population and GDP for per-capita donor charts Recomputed 2026-11-01 data.worldbank.org
Publish What You Fund ATI 2024 · 50 organisations Transparency scoring context (6 UN entities assessed); cited, not recomputed Cited as published publishwhatyoufund.org
Editorial Discipline & Disclaimer

Methodology & Limitations

CARTA BLANCA ECONOMICS · A PERSONAL STUDY BY ORIOL CERVANTES

What this observatory does: Reports what is published in primary public sources. Measures published data against declared methodology. Documents series breaks and reporting gaps. Presents statistical patterns without editorial inference.

What this observatory does not do: Infer intent. Attribute causation. Make policy recommendations. Estimate or impute missing data. The largest-contributor share (Story chapter 2 / Observatory §07) is arithmetic applied to published 2024 CEB data, not a political position.

Known limitations: The CEB expenditure-by-function series starts in 2018; $290.6B of 2013–2019 country expenditure has no comparable functional breakdown. Government contributor labels are kept as listed by the CEB. Revenue growth is nominal (see Methodology for constant perimeter). PWYF ATI scores cover only 6 of 48 UN entities. Procurement vendor-level data is not integrated with CEB financial flows. Palestine appears under three different names in source data ($12.7B split across them). All known gaps are reported as gaps in the observatory.

Reproducibility: All figures are computable from the primary sources listed above using the aggregation methodology described in the observatory. Recomputed automatically from the CSV files on 2026-11-01; no external human review yet. No proprietary data, no estimated values, no generated content. Cleaned tables: Methodology, download the cleaned tables.

Independence: This observatory has no institutional affiliation, receives no funding, and has no relationship with any UN entity, government, or advocacy organisation. The author worked at UNDP, WHO and UNICEF in the past. It is an independent single-author study. The analysis reflects patterns observable in public data, not positions on how those patterns should be interpreted.

CEB data, reference year 2024 · downloaded 2026-10 · build 2026-11 · v1.6.2 · Publisher: Carta Blanca Labs

About this study

Why this study exists

The CEB and UNGM publish UN system financing in detail, but across many separate datasets that are rarely read together. Flows puts those public series side by side, so that funding quality, donor concentration and reporting gaps can be discussed on the same evidence.

Method in three lines. 1. Download the published CEB Financial Statistics, CEB HR Statistics and UNGM reports. 2. Compute every headline figure with one script into a single file, flows.json, that stores source, years, formula and limitation. 3. Publish only what the data supports, and show gaps as gaps. Full methodology.

No inference of intent · No political position · No affiliation
Author
Oriol Cervantes

Data and operations professional with around fifteen years at UNDP, UNICEF and WHO. Flows is an independent study published by Carta Blanca Labs and does not represent the views of any organisation.

LinkedIn profile · oriolcervantes.com
CEB data as published, reference year 2024 · Downloaded 2026-10 · Build 2026-11 · v1.6.2 · Coverage 2011–2024 · Source file: flows.json · Changelog